🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could potentially return the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could affect similar debates in additional member states