🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: police body cam footage. Faces of victims, witnesses and potential offenders loom up to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of headlights or flashlights as the officers approach, their faces and voices expressing caution or panic or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently catch sight of the faces of the law enforcement personnel, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what sometimes seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have previously seen the streaming service real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her boyfriend, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, made exclusively of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids allegedly harassed and antagonized her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the police were repeatedly called, the accused fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to address her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The arresting officers found proof that Lorincz had done online research into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which permit householders and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie builds its story with the officer recordings captured during the repeated police visits to the scene before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered incident site itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of the caller calling the police in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also jail video of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really imply anything too complicated about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the children are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The film is showcased as an example of how “stand your ground” laws generate senseless and tragic violence. But the reality of firearm possession and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a deceased pundit famously claimed made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how minimal concern the police took in this aspect. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in footage that didn’t make the edit). Or is gun ownership so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what seemed to her neighbors a extended period, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not aggressively, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she just can’t do it. Did the gentle handling up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A deeply sobering portrayal of U.S. justice and consequences.